Clifton v. Johnson: The Texas Supreme Court Puts Some Guardrails on Van Dyke
The Texas Supreme Court's Clifton v. Johnson decision delivers the clearest guidance yet on when the Van Dyke floating royalty presumption can be overcome.
Producer’s Edge
TEXAS OIL AND GAS LAW BULLETIN
Get our email newsletter and unlock access to subscriber-only content and updates
Processing your application
Please check your inbox and click the link to confirm your subscription (check your spam).
There was an error sending the email
Get started with our featured articles
The Texas Business Court Continues to Stress the Importance of Properly Pleading Facts to Support Your Cause of Action
The Texas Business Court's latest opinion in Enosis Investments v. Jensen delivers another clear message: insufficient pleading will sink your case — before it ever reaches trial.
26-Step Mechanical Framework For Interpreting Deeds?
Texas courts reject "mechanical" deed interpretation while creating a 26-step framework. Bush v. Yarborough reveals the irony of structured analysis disguised as flexible law.
Supreme Court of Texas Washes Out the “Anadarko Washout”
If your co-tenant drills the well… does your lease still live? The Texas Supreme Court just tackled a high-stakes question that’s shaken up oil and gas titles across the state.
Plain Language Meets Common Sense: Hidden Traps in Oil Patch Contract Interpretation
What happens when a court reads your contract literally for one issue but decides what 'makes sense' for another? A geophysicist just found out.
Unclear Jury Instructions Allow for Various Interpretations
Lario Oil & Gas Co. v. Black Hawk Energy Services, Ltd. highlights the importance of carefully drafting jury instructions and questions.
Oilfield Bankruptcy and Game Plan
Oil and gas price volatility is as much a part of the energy business as drill bits. Few predicted that the current down-cycle would be as long or as deep as it is proving to be.
William Sciscoe v. Enbridge Gathering
On June 1, 2015 the Amarillo Court of Appeals issued an opinion concerning whether a landowner may have a cause of action for nuisance or trespass against a company conducting regulated oil and gas operations in the vicinity.
Forecasting a Rise in Lease Termination and Royalty Litigation Amidst Prolonged Oil Slump
Originally appearing in the Energy Expert Analysis Section of Law360. Law360, New York (September 25, 2015) -- Over the last five years, American shale production has more than tripled. Since last October, however, the oil and gas industry has trudged through a long and pronounced slump in crude oil prices in...
N.D. Supreme Court Discusses Duty Owed by Field Landmen and Compensation for Lease Acquisition
On September 21, 2015, the North Dakota Supreme Court issued its opinion in Border Res., LLC v. Irish Oil & Gas, Inc., – N.W.2d -—, 2015 WL 5519421, 2015 ND 238 (N.D. 2015), where it reviewed two primary issues: (1) whether a field land services company owed a fiduciary...
Texas Supreme Court to Determine Whether Accommodation Doctrine Applies to Severed Groundwater Estate
The Texas Supreme Court recently granted Coyote Lake Ranch's petition to review an opinion by the Amarillo Court of Appeals in Lubbock v. Coyote Lake Ranch, holding that the "Accommodation Doctrine" does not apply to the relationship between a surface owner and the owner of a...
Case Law Update: ConocoPhillips Must Release 15K Acres
Texas Case Law Update: On August 5, 2015, the San Antonio Court of Appeals released its opinion in ConocoPhillips Company v. Vaquillas Unproven Minerals, Ltd., (( No. 04-15-00066-CV (San Antonio – August 5, 2015). )) affirming the trial court’s order declaring ConocoPhillips breached two oil and gas leases in...
Recommended
